Warning: include() [function.include]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in C:\www\theincider.com\backissues\2\regulars\letters.php on line 13

Warning: include(http://www.theincider.com/lhsear.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in C:\www\theincider.com\backissues\2\regulars\letters.php on line 13

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening 'http://www.theincider.com/lhsear.php' for inclusion (include_path='.;C:\php5\pear') in C:\www\theincider.com\backissues\2\regulars\letters.php on line 13

Warning: include() [function.include]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in C:\www\theincider.com\backissues\2\regulars\letters.php on line 17

Warning: include(http://www.theincider.com/rhsear.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in C:\www\theincider.com\backissues\2\regulars\letters.php on line 17

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening 'http://www.theincider.com/rhsear.php' for inclusion (include_path='.;C:\php5\pear') in C:\www\theincider.com\backissues\2\regulars\letters.php on line 17

 

If you would like to send The Incider a letter, please email us at letters@theincider.com


Dear Incider,

I may be totally irrational with my fears but after only three games of the season I really fear our battle this year is more likely to be to avoid the drop than win promotion. You can’t read too much into the first three results. On all three occasions the home team have been playing against a nine or ten man away side and have unsurprisingly taken the points. While we took three points at home to Blackpool, I think most City fans appreciate that up until the sending offs we had created very little. Brentford was much more of an encouraging performance but we still lost. Wigan meanwhile was the wrong result with a poor performance.

More worrying than any of the games individually are the trends that seem to have appeared. At the back we always look as though we could concede. In midfield we may have the ‘bite’ of Tommy D and Joe Burnell but we look woefully uncreative. And when we do create chances our strikers have not been finishing them off. It goes without saying that this does not bode well for the season. I don’t think we’ll be anybody’s whipping boys, but fear we will lose far too many games by the odd goal. As it would appear we won’t be signing anyone we may be relying on the experience of Messrs. Carey and Tinnion to rescue us. Maybe I’m panicking far too early but I fear that it could be a long season and a bottom half would not surprise me at all.

Pete Smith (Percy Parrot)

Dear Incider,

As I see it, the opening three games of this season have indicated two main positives and two main negatives:

Positives:

1. Phillips’ improved kicking, distribution and general command of his area.
2. The general sound look of our back four.

Negatives:

1. The lack of goals.
2. Wilson's apparent loyalty to under-performing players and playing players out of position.

Now although I subscribe to the theory that three games into the season is too early to be making sweeping statements about how the season is going to progress, I hope that the BCFC management will give some consideration to the concerns highlighted in these games.

First of all, let's start with the positives. In the games thus far I have been very impressed with the way our injury-weakened defence has performed. Whether this is down to an improvement from Phillips, the move to four at the back, or the reintroduction of Millen in front of Phillips is anybody's guess. Personally I reckon it is a combination of all three factors.

When it became evident that Wilson was going to be unable to bring in a "first ball centre-half" the four at the back option became the obvious solution. If you're playing three at the back the ideal candidate to play in the centre of the three is the "first ball centre-half” we've heard so much about. However, the rigidity a back four gives you means the acquisition of such a player is less important and therefore this suits the players we currently have better. Also, the most successful goalkeeper/centre-back pairing in recent City history has been the Steve Phillips/Keith Millen axis we have seen a return to this season. Whilst both have their critics, there is no doubting that Steve Phillips’ game has come on a great deal this season. He even comes for crosses now! Some of that has to come down to having a centre-back he trusts sitting in front of him.

However, despite this new defensive soundness, we appear to have lost something going forward, maybe as a direct result of it. Wilson obviously likes to line up with Murray on the right flank and Aaron Brown on the ,left but as some people have noticed, Aaron seems less willing to perform the wide midfielder's role. Thus, when we attack we lose our shape down the left. This has the result of making us look very lop-sided and reduces our effectiveness down the left flank. Whether the solution is to give Aaron a kick up the arse or bring in someone else like Simon Clist or Liam Rosenior who is more able to perform the role is something Wilson has to decide, but he can't let things carry on the way they are. Hopefully, he will use the Brown suspension to try this out but I reckon the more likely outcome is that he will return to 3-5-2 in Aaron's absence.

Just one goal from two forwards is slightly concerning but during these games there have also been encouraging signs that Peacock & Roberts are beginning to form an understanding. They have to sort this out pretty smartish though if we are to maintain any sort of close proximity to the play-off positions. During the opening three games there has been enough in our performances to suggest that we have the players capable of imposing our game onto the opposition. But whilst we have often enjoyed the lion's share of possession and territory, the shots on target (and consequently the goals for column) are looking pretty spartan. I'm of the opinion that if we keep playing as we are the goals WILL come, but if this drought continues over the next few games then Wilson will seriously have to consider juggling his personnel and, yes, this includes Peacock if he isn't performing.

Maybe one way of maintaining our defensive shape whilst increasing our potency up front whilst Aaron and Coles are absent would be to switch to a variant of 4-3-3:


Phillips

Burnell Millen Hill Bell

Hulbert Doherty Liam/Clist

Murray Peacock Roberts

With this formation I'd have Peacock almost as a lone man up front with Roberts and Murray playing slightly deeper but closer than wingers. This way, when defending Murray and Roberts can drop back into midfield to give us five in midfield while still having the pace to join the attack when we get the ball back. This would also utilise Murray and Roberts' strengths of running at defenders.

Thankfully the decisions aren't for me to make and we'll have to see what Danny decides upon. But if we are to maintain any hope of the play-offs this season I would say nine or ten points is the minimum we should be looking for from our next four matches - three of which are at home.

Ian Marriner (Madger)


Dear Incider,

Writing this letter after the Brentford game I am probably setting myself up for a fall. However, after being at Griffin Park on Tuesday night I really do feel that we can make a promotion challenge this season.

I don't think it was just City's performance. Brentford’s own display also led me to this bout of optimism. All of sudden a league that I thought would be strong at the start of the season is caving in with the exception of the obvious two - Wigan and Cardiff. Brentford did nothing creative up front for the whole match. Our defence must be given credit for this as well, but isn't this the same Brentford that had just comfortably beaten Huddersfield away from home? I think the fact that Swindon are up the top of the league says a lot!

With no major long-term injuries or sales of players we will be up there again come May. And by the way, a slower start might be just what the doctor ordered as I think that our players are much better at playing catch up. Whenever they reach the dizzy heights of this division we ALWAYS come crashing down.

Will Collins (PhatWill)


Dear Incider,

At the end of last season I was unable to muster up any enthusiasm for this current season because I could see nothing changing within the playing staff. My philosophy is a simple one - if a squad isn’t good enough one season then it won’t be good enough the next without additions. No additions equals no progress.

For at least two seasons, possibly three, we have called for the purchase of a goal-scoring midfielder, a commanding centre back and a cultural architect anywhere on the pitch. Roberts is the only addition and we have lost Thorpe and Jones. Nothing else has happened.

We got off to dodgy start with a 2-0 win over Blackpool and in my opinion it was very disappointing display. Then, after playing well, we lost at Brentford. Typical City.

I have no confidence in City`s ability to put together an unbeaten run. There seems to be a lack innovation and leadership on the pitch and no players who will cajole and motivate those around them - cultural architects. I suppose the nearest we have is Tommy Doherty.

All successfull sides have such players. Roy Keane and Patrick Viera are perfect examples at the highest level. Last year Brentford had Rowlands and Evans whilst Cardiff had the magnificent Kavanagh. Shaun Taylor was the cultural architect in Ward’s promotion-winning side. Ian Holloway was the man when the Dark Side were going well. City have no-one of that ilk currently.

I’m not a pessimist, nor am I a blind optimist - just a realist and I honestly can’t see City being promotion candidates at this point in time.

Lansdown says that if Wilson approached the board regarding a potential player then they will look at all the options, but that so far Wilson had not approached the board on this matter. If that is so, then in my opinion Wilson is derelict in his duty to the football club. Everyone knows that the squad needs more quality. The jury is still out on Wilson.

I sincerely hope that City sign two or three players to fill the gaps that are so obvious to all of us because if we don’t then its mid-table obscurity at best this season. Sad, but true.

Alan Robinson


Dear Incider,

Your site has cheered me up on the eve of what I believe will be a frustrating season for City fans. City have a cracking midfield who will ensure we see plenty of the ball and with the addition of someone – anyone - with a lethal finish, we would be title contenders.

The fact is that the last decent finishers we had were Goater and Akinbyi .No one has really made it since, although I suppose you might argue a case for Thorpe. Personally, I found Thorpe's attitude and his frequent dry spells disappointing. (Even more disappointing was City's insistence in kicking long high balls up to the shortest player on the pitch!)

Peacock is likely to make a decent tally this season and Roberts must be better than we've seen so far, but I can't see these two getting us in the top six - let alone promoted.

Richard Stewart (The Mauler)


Dear Incider,

Just found your website and it is excellent - one that doesn't talk down to the true City fan.

I am a season ticket holder in the Carling Atyeo Stand with my brother and we will be travelling down to the gate from West London for every home game this season. I would like to offer a lift to any other London-based fans who fancy sharing the journey. I am also trying to find out about any City supporters club in London - one where like minded City fans meet up for a few beers and discuss City-related stuff. I would be grateful if anyone could let me know if such a thing exists.

Meanwhile keep up the good work and I look forward to the next edition.

Michael Prior


Dear Incider,

What do I think of it so far? My overriding impression is that we are playing a more direct brand of football than we have for a while. A couple of seasons ago we went through a phase of very slow, patient build-up with virtually everything being rolled out from the back through Tinnion to the wide men or central strikers. It enabled us to keep control of the ball for extended periods of play but inevitably meant that by the time the ball reached the penalty box the opposition were usually ready for us. I thought this was going to be the Wilson way and enjoyed what I saw.

What struck me at Brentford was the speed with which we were attempting to shift the ball forward, with Phillips kicking the ball out more often than not and Roberts dropping deep to pick it up and run at the defence from the halfway line rather than waiting for it to come to him. It didn't come off on the night but we did create four or five good chances
in the second half that could have won us the game if Peacock and Brown had shown a bit more composure and Murray had had a little bit of luck.

The downside of this approach is, of course, that we give the ball away much more easily and Tom D, Matty Hill, Louis C et al are going to be kept busy winning it back. Will this more direct approach win us promotion? It's simply too early to say, but if the following three elements drop into place I think it could:

* Rosenoir replaces A Brown on the left flank to give us a more balanced
attack - and chips in with half a dozen goals.

* Roberts and Peacock click - I thought there were signs of this happening
against Brentford - and start taking the chances they are creating.

* Tom D stays fit and plays the full season.

Martyn Hocking (Well Red)


Dear Incider,

It is with regret that I feel obliged to complain to your scurrilous rag.

Having read Issue One, I (along with many others, I feel) sent to you a cheque for £1 million. In return for this I was assured in your 'Reader Offer' section that I would receive a Tony Thorpe coaster.

I must protest at its quality. Having had the item for over a week now it has not enhanced my social standing. Indeed, I have been held up to ridicule by my friends from Bedfordshire.

They claim to have had a similar article several years ago, when at that time it was a highly polished new item that brought a return on their investment. In time they passed it on to friends in London under the impression that it would be nurtured and cherished. Instead a man with a 20-year-old cycling injury who claimed that he would indeed 'love it' soon disposed of the coaster.

I feel that an element of fraud is at hand here. How is it possible that a once highly regarded item that would have brought joy to many households can now simply be sold as a coaster?

Paul Watts (Working Late Again)


Dear Incider,

As Tony Thorpe`s number one fan (previously), I would like to take umbrage at your attempt to ridicule our former top scorer’s reputation.

Tony Thorpe was often seen practising his putting stroke with great application, long after the ball had passed him by, and then cajoling his team mates because theirs wasn’t as good as his.

He was often seen long after his team mates had gone home, honing his right arm at the Sawyers Arms in Nailsea. He was also known to purchase greasy bacon baguettes from the in-store bakery at his local Esso garage. He was once seen there at 9.45am on a Sunday morning still wearing his City tracksuit! What dedication is that?

He also parked his car on the kerb outside the video shop (still wearing his City tracksuit) and didn’t get a ticket. Now that’s real skill.

These are factors that you must have overlooked when you decided to ridicule our former star. I’m sure he would be very disappointed to know that after three seasons of loyal service to Tony Thorpe, he’s regarded as the laziest player to wear a City shirt since Jacki Dziekanowski.

Name and address supplied.


Dear Incider,

In light of RedTop's pathetic begging posts for contributions (has he no shame?) I thought I'd share with you my feelings on the Brentford trip. Firstly, I regret not bumping into you or other forum members at Brentford. Maybe another time.

Anyway, here's the report. I can't pretend this is witty, insightful or even erudite but it does perfectly sum up my feelings:

"We lost. Bollocks."

For your records, my size is large and I'd like the home shirt. Thanks.

Chivs


Dear Incider,

I enjoyed the interview with Liam Rosenior. Would it be possible to ask him: What it was that made him twice the player he was when he left us for a month?

Rich Bailey (RichieB)

P.S. I had no idea that RedTop and Edson were so close! Spooky.


Dear Incider,

Great site. I have added it to my favourites. I look forward to some intelligent and critical but irrationally loyal copy. And we will all need the humour!

The following contribution is from my CD: "Bristol City Ruined My Life; But Made My Day."

European Champions League Final:
Imaginary Madrid (0) 0 Bristol City (1) 4

This was splendid revenge for City's losing to Madrid in last year's quarter finals in Bristol after getting a promising, though goalless, away draw in Spain. Andrew Cole's hat trick surely confirms him now as England's most economical striker and bodes well for the country's chances of winning a record-breaking third consecutive World Cup. Veteran England manager (and former City star) Brian Clough describes him as the most exacting player he's watched since Len Shackleton, with whom he shared that dazzling 1958 World Cup triumph, along with Sir Duncan Edwards and other miraculous survivors of the previous year's Munich air disaster, and with whom the legendary City number nine Saint John Atyeo scored the best part of 200 goals for England (Atyeo 105, Shackleton 89). City have now won the European Cup twice in three years and despite losing an exciting three-way championship race to West Ham this year (pipping tee-totaller George Best's brilliant Aston Villa into third) also won the FA Cup for a record twelfth time since that historic 1-0 victory over Manchester United in 1909. That game, remember, was famous for the way that Billy Wedlock disputed the toss - a very important factor on a Crystal Palace pitch that went downhill with the wind all through City's utterly dominant first half - and won it on a second throw. All on the toss of a coin. I wonder how the history of football might have been altered in that moment. Who knows, it might even be Bristol City, not Alex Ferguson's gallant and under-rated Manchester United currently struggling to attain former glories in Division Three with only the Welsh Cup and a Skoda Windscreens Shield to their name.

Gareth Calway

P.S. Look out for my name on the back of a seat near you.


Dear Incider,

Best of luck with the new addition to City's online presence. Having three of you will help - one to take the plaudits, two to take the blame!

Mick H (Red'Un)

Editor replies: Cheers Mick, and good luck with the newly-relaunched www.bclife.co.uk. It’s a quality site.


Dear Incider,

Congratulations on the concept of The Incider.

With the three of you having different but such complimentary skills, I'm confident that we will have a fanzine that will be professional, amusing and well presented. I hope that you will receive the essential support from your fellow fans that such a project demands to maintain the necessary width of interest and opinion.

All the best for the launch. Where's the champagne reception?

Graham B

Dear Incider,

Congratulations on the site from A Hammers fan. It’s very, very impressive. Must have taken you flippin' ages to set up though! Good luck this season - remember you're only a few years away from challenging the mighty Hammers for the Premiership title! Then you'll have to win the world cup like we did in 66 (Hurst, Peters and Moore).

Mark Coleman

Dear Incider,

Hiya to all of the Incider crew. Manchester United, Bristol City and England rock. I'd like to say well done for creating such a brilliant website. It is a great website and all the crew have put lots of effort into it. I will tell all my friends about it. WELL DONE. KEEP THIS SITE GOING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lauren Edwards (aged 10), Warrington.


Warning: include() [function.include]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in C:\www\theincider.com\backissues\2\regulars\letters.php on line 422

Warning: include(http://www.theincider.com/backissues/2/menu.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in C:\www\theincider.com\backissues\2\regulars\letters.php on line 422

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening 'http://www.theincider.com/backissues/2/menu.php' for inclusion (include_path='.;C:\php5\pear') in C:\www\theincider.com\backissues\2\regulars\letters.php on line 422